Enemy of the Left

Two days ago Martha Coakley, democrat candidate for the open Massachusetts Senate seat vacated by the late Ted Kennedy did a radio interview with talk show host Ken Pittman of WBSM 1420am in Massachusetts' south coast. Pittman asked Coakley if she would pass a health care bill that included a conscientious objector provision to certain procedures, most likely abortion and/or contraceptives. She said she would not support any bill that had this provision because abortion is legal under Roe vs Wade and that health care workers "have" to full fill that law. This statement in itself is incorrect as not all medical facilities perform abortions. When Pittman pushed her on this she mentioned that her opponent Republican state senator Scott Brown did file an amendment to a Massachusetts bill giving hospitals or E.R. personnel the ability to deny "emergency" contraceptives, i.e. abortion or the "Morning after pill" based on there religious beliefs. Coakley stated that there is a "separation of church and state" which is a fantasy used by the democrats. What the Constitution actually says in the First amendment is "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". Which means that there would be NO state sponsored religion like the church of England that was forced on people by the British government. Remember the colonists came here FOR religious freedom! The words "Separation of church and state is NOT found ANYWHERE in the Constitution, nor any of our founding documents, NONE!

Pittman challenges her by saying "in the emergency room you still have your religious freedom." After stammering from that statement she goes on to say "the law says that people are "allowed" to have that and you can have religious freedom; you shouldn't work in the emergency room."

So now Coakley, democrat, is begrudgingly confirming that the law "says" you have religious freedom, but wants to put limits or confines on that religious freedom and in doing so will tell you where to work and what to do!

A rational person would say "If a hospital or individual does not want to perform an act that puts them at odds with their religious teachings and beliefs they should have the right to deny that request to anyone. Eventhough the person seeking these services does not hold the same beliefs their rights under the law should not squash someone else's rights of religious freedom given to them under the first amendment! The person seeking such a service still has the ability to find another individual or facility that does not have those same beliefs that would restrict them under their religion." A popular satellite radio host, Andrew Wilkow has a saying and it applies here. "Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to free of you."

Instead like every other issue that liberal democrats take up, they do away with personal responsibility and choice and instead want to change everything for everyone to fit their agenda!



The Church, Abortion and War - the Real numbers

The Catholic church itself has condemned abortion since it has become legal with
the Supreme courts decision in the Roe vs Wade case in 1973 making it legal in the U.S. Since that controversial decision was made there have been 49,551,703 abortions performed in the U.S. alone according to the Guttmacher Institute and the National right to life website!! That's 49,551,703 children that never had a chance to live because of their Mother's incredibly selfish decision not to carry the baby to term and at the very least give the child the chance at life by putting it up for adoption. Now, some cases might have been rape, incest, safety of the mother or of the realization that the fetus was deformed in some way or that some other birth defect was detected that the parents didn't want to or couldn't deal with. That being said does anyone really believe that even a small number of these 49,551,703 abortions were because of rape, incest, safety of the mother or birth defects? I don't. These excuses, though some may be valid, are mostly just a way to justify this horrible, evil law!

Now let's rack up the numbers of that most "evil" tool of humanity that the liberals always condemn the U.S. for, WAR. So we know liberal's love Roe vs Wade and a women's "right" to choose and they hate, hate, hate war because of all the "Innocent" victims is creates. Let's compare the number of deaths from abortion to the number of deaths from ALL U.S. war involvement shall we?

So we already know that since 1973 when Roe vs Wade made abortion legal in the U.S. there have been 49,551,703 from 1973 to January 2010.

Now, according to Department of Defense's own data the total number of U.S. war deaths both in theater and out of theater is 1,194,144 since the inception of the nation!!!

Which amount if greater?
49,551,703
or
1,194,144

The church condemns abortion outright. If you are Catholic and follow the church's doctrine and the teachings of Jesus how could you perform such an act? Even if you are not devout, but still believe in Christ how could you? I say that you could not and that health care workers should have the right under our religious freedom to refuse to kill another human being no matter how old they are! If you believe abortion is as much a murder as any other act that involuntarily stops a human beings heart then how can any government law or official force you to become a murderer in God's eyes? God's law is more powerful, "Thou Shall Not Kill"

If you have to protect your or your families lives from another and you end up killing that person in your defense then I think that is justified. Someone trying to do evil upon you or your family has made that choice and deserves the consequences. A little unborn baby being killed inside it's Mother's womb, before it has a chance to live even one day or take it's first breath, is truly the height of evil! God has granted this little creature life and who are we as humans to deny it?

One more thing, I know some will be offended at my stance here and to that I say I'm sorry. I'm sorry that you don't see the bigger picture here. I'm sorry that you excuse evil. If you think I'm wrong and you think a women's "right to choose" to abort her baby is correct then why don't you go watch an abortion on the web? I have. Just google "abortion video", you'll find it. Then why don't you pass it around through email and post it on facebook and let all your friends celebrate your "right to choose". If Roe vs Wade was such a great, terrific court decision then I'm sure they would all love to see the video of the end result right??

If you find you can not pass this video around, if you can not stand to look at the horrible images of dismembered babies, which is part of it, then I suggest that the Roe vs Wade decision was wrong and evil. I suggest that anyone like Martha Coakley that wants to make people go against God and their religion and perform abortions on women who are either ignorant at best or evil at worst is themselves evil. And finally, if you take the position of "well, I wouldn't get an abortion, but I don't want to stop anyone else from getting one, that's their decision." This is like saying, "I wouldn't murder anyone, but I'm not going to tell someone else they can't murder someone, that's their choice." Do you see the ridiculousness of it now? If you still take that position then I say you are supporting evil and Satan directly by NOT condemning this evil act. With your inaction you are going against God!

Now you have a REAL choice to make!

This documentary is a fact based film you can watch for free on you tube. We are being scammed! This is a fraud and when you watch this film you will be armed with facts from scientists from all over the world, NOT from pundits that are politically charged or from politicians themselves like Al Gore, the poster boy for man made Global warming.

Isn't it funny that old Al OWNS a major part of a carbon credit company (see here for the article) and he's the one pushing the use of carbon credits as a "remedy" to global warming??

So you give money for using too much carbon and then you get a piece of paper saying your money will go to "offsetting" your carbon use and the money goes where?? Who checks to see if Al really goes and plants trees or whatever with your money? This is the biggest scam in world history and the only reason it has gotten this far is because of willful ignorance of the media and the people themselves!

Enjoy the film.



The Great Global Warming Swindle Documentary

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

Part 7

Part 8

Obama and the dems never get it. Now they will hold another "Job summit" and talk of a second "stimulus" plan is being considered and pushed by speaker of the house, Nancy (Bela) Pelosi (I want to suck your wallet!)

Gov't doesn't create permanent jobs as we are seeing now with the failed $787 Billion dollar stimulus boondoggle they rammed through and their lying about jobs in non existent congressional districts. The only way to really create jobs and opportunity for people is to get gov't out of the way by lowering taxes on both established and new businesses. Make it attractive for business owners from around the world to come back to the U.S.
Why do people think these businesses left in the first place? Over burdensome regulations which gov't forcefully inserted like it was a primary partner in people's private business, ever increasing taxes and fees, labor unions that increasingly demanded more and more money and benefits to the point that some demanded part of the companies profits and yes, healthcare costs that have been driven up by gov't itself by forcing hospitals to cover people who can't pay in the emergency room, like illegal aliens. Also, health insurance companies are made to mandatorely cover many different procedures and events that they might not cover in basic plans or they could be offered ala cart to a subscriber.

Tort reform is not mentioned. Letting people buy insurance across state lines is not mentioned to increase competition between health insurance companies thus lowering costs to the subscriber, but we keep hearing from Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reed that the gov't run public option, which will become a monopoly itself in the end, WILL increase competition and lower costs? These people are living in fantasyland. They don't care about the people. It's all about control of the people and their resources for the democrats.

Should there be a safety net type of insurance for people with pre existing conditions? Yes, some sort of gov't backed insurance should be made available to them, no doubt. I also believe that people should be pushed to have a catastrophic medical insurance plan that would cover medical bills from huge procedures or treatments. These are exactly the ones that cause people to have to file for bankruptcy. These types of insurance plans have been out there for years. They have high deductibles, which keep their costs down and they are not meant to be used for everyday doctor visits or prescriptions. If people got a tax incentive to buy these plans we would no longer have a problem in this area. This is another example of letting the free markets solve a problem. In going this route you do NOT have to relent to the bureaucratic whims of a "medical" board telling you what will be covered for you health and when you can get it. By doing things yourself and solving your own problems you remain FREE!!

Government IS the problem with almost every aspect of our lives! When Ireland lowered their business tax rate why is it that companies flocked there and Irish immigrants that once came to America looking for jobs went home? What, because the lowering of taxes to attract new business "didn't" work?

The answer to America's economic problems are obvious.

-Lower taxes on both business and the people.
-Reduce or eliminate burdensome regulation on business and people.
-Stop unfunded mandates to the states that the states pass on to the people through taxes.
-Reduce spending and stop printing money which will ultimately create hyper-inflation.
-Reduce the size of the federal government.
-Reduce the dependence on foreign nations for energy.
-Make Congress adhere to the 18 enumerated powers listed for them in the Constitution with no other
powers.
-Eliminate the federal reserve, which is itself unconstitutional.
-Go back to a currency that is backed up by a hard asset like gold, silver, oil, ect.

Our "representatives" in Washington though will not do this because it would diminish their control over the people and it would reduce their use of a "crisis" to get their agenda through. Yes, I'm speaking to you Obama and the rest of the dems on Capital hill. You don't deserve the seats you hold and to me and many you are bordering on treason against the people of this great nation just so you can get your agenda passed. Vote Conservative in the 2010 Congressional election and again in the 2012 Presidential election as well as your local elections.

Also, you may soon hear of a proposed national Constitutional Convention. many pundits and politicians alike will criticize this, saying it is very dangerous, that when you hold a Constitutional convention the whole country could be taken over. This is not true. first off the Congress hates this idea because it will change the rules for them and here is the best part, they are NOT in control of it once it has been convened! The status quo is very nervous of the national Concon as it's called. Secondly, Concon representatives, which are sent by the states, cannot change anything, they can only make suggestions and come up with proposed amendments. It would still take 3/4's of the states to ratify ANY amendment to the Constitution. So say there was an amendment to ban all guns from the people, or to ban the first amendment or to do something else that was crazy like repeal the entire Constitution and replace it with a U.N. approved Constitution(which has been suggested believe it or not.). Do you think that 38 states would vote to ratify such radical changes? Of course not. What would happen though would be a clarification of the Constitution's Second amendment, the commerce clause, the general welfare clause, maybe even a repeal of the 16th amendment that supposedly gave the federal gov't the power to tax income and maybe the 14th amendment which is used by illegal aliens to sneak in the country, have a child and then that child is now a citizen. Of course, you can't throw the Mother and Father out because who will take care of the child who is now a legal citizen? These types of misused, unclear amendments and out right usurpations of power and liberty by the politicians in Washington and in some states is exactly why we need another Constitutional Convention. It is really our only path to stopping the tyrants in D.C. because they will not listen to us anymore.

Delahunt was a puzzle to me he would do many good things for his constituents but now I realize they all were "social" things. How could I have ever thought that a man that made a deal with the socialist/communist dictator Hugo Chavez who uses brutal tactics in his own country for cheap oil for the Mass. citizens energy plan instead of making a deal with the U.S. oil companies would possibly play within the Constitutional rules?

Just another reason to go to the July 4th Tea parties around the nation! These next tax protests will be even bigger than the ones on April 15th, which I attended in Boston! I will write about that soon too. I have been remiss in my responsibility of keeping this blog updated. Sorry.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123759908731101583.html - Please read this.

We as Conservatives talk about small government, less taxes. less spending, protection of rights and so on. Unfortunately, our only way back into control of the government is through the Republican party as it seems a third party won't even be given a real chance in this country. Here I read in the WSJ that Republicans that voted no for the Stimulus package and the Omnibus bill are now going back home and bragging about the money coming to their state and taking credit for it!! How hypocritical can you be? It is exactly this type of behavior that makes voters say, "Both parties are the same." and you know what with Republicans that want the money and spending as much as Democrats to keep getting re-elected, they're right! We need people in all stages of government who want to change the country for the better. Who want to get back to strict Constitutional guide lines and if they do that and they don't get re-elected then it's ok. This idea that keeping your office seat at all costs and you never get anything done has to stop! This was never meant to be a permanent career.So, in closing if we Conservatives want to regain the trust and power of control of government from the American people then we need to start acting like responsible adults. What this country needs, what this Conservative movement needs is real, honest leadership. So far I haven't seen it. Republicans could have taken out all the earmarks they proposed in the Omnibus bill and then put it to the democrats to do the same, but they didn't. Even Minority leader Rep. Boehner when asked directly by Fox news if the Republicans should pull their earmarks and use that as a rallying cry for fiscal responsibility and as a campaign plank for the mid term elections in 2010 just danced around it and gave the typical political double talk. Martha McCallum from Fox was obviously disgusted and just ended the interview after that answer. You see. moew interested in keeping his position than helping the country. This has to stop!

Basically someone who read Enemy of the Left said this, " I wouldn't take any blog serious that questioned Barack Obama's citizenship." There was more, but nothing of content.

Here is my response:

Well, sorry that you're so hypnotized by Obama that you wouldn't take seriously any blog that posts about the con man in chief not supplying his vault copy birth certificate. I know, it's really a crazy idea that we hold accountable candidates for the most powerful office in the world to PROVE their citizenship, something Obama has never done! Oh wait, I know he posted a "live birth certification" document on his own website that has been criticized by many for being a fraud and then another website (fightthesmears.com) that is affiliated with the Obama campaign, confirmed it. Well, all is ok now right? You're a fool. I say that not because you criticize me, but because you don't have the intelligence to question someone's past and their qualifications. What flavor kool aid did the local Obama campaign office give you? The Obama campaign is using you and all your ilk. They don't give a crap about you, me, the country or it's future. They only care about one thing, Tolatarian Power! You and the millions like you that were used up and will be spit out without a second glance by Obama after he no longer needs you like his own Grandmother, Tony Rezko, William Ayers, Rev. Wright to reach an end that helps him and only him. Wake up and do what is best for your country from this point on! Supporting an admitted Marxist is not in this countries best interest. Socialism/Communism has failed everywhere it's ever been tried. People like YOU will suffer the consequences of the tolatarian state Obama dreams of. He promotes "Change". He promotes "equality" and "fairness". He promotes stealing from the people who have ambition and the drive to produce and earn for themselves and he wants to give their property, their earnings to the lazy, stupid, and unmotivated who risk nothing therefore they have nothing to lose. The last two leaders who promoted such ideas were Castro in Cuba and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Their countries have performed wonderfully under Socialist/Communist rule haven't they? In one country people have been kept down in a morass of mediocrity with poor health care (no matter what Michael Moore says) and lack of ANY rights not approved by the state. It has been going so well there people have done anything to get out! I don't see Americans swimming to Cuba to escape freedom. Do you? In Chavez's "dream" country every "nationalized" industry has either slowed to a trickle or has stopped altogether because the people working them have NO incentive to work more because they earn the same no matter if they work themselves to the bone or sit on the asses all day. In Venezuela, Chavez has refused to put oil revenues back into maintenance and upgrading equipment. He has also given sweet heart oil deals to his "friends" around latin america while the people in his country starve! His only full price customer? The U.S. who he regularly insults and denounces capitolism. Chavez and his country missed the oil boom all together because of his lack of fore sight. Now is going to run for "President for Life" in the next election. I wonder if he'll win? Now Obama is touting the same B.S. anti capitalism, pie in the sky rhetoric as Castro, Chavez, Hitler, Stalin, Marx, and Lenin. We all now know how sucessful and fair and compassionate their reins and idealogies were don't we? How many did Stalin and his communist regime kill because they didn't agree with him or maybe because he just felt like killing them? 30? 50? 100 Million? The numbers increase all the time after new Stalinist atrocities are revealed. So you keep poo, pooing Obama and his refusal to produce hard evidence of his citizenship and his refusal to release his medical records and his refusal to release his college records. "Don't pay any attention to that man behind the curtin!" Keep the blinders on buddy. All is all right or should I say, all Left!

The following is the exact wording of the Cato institute's full page ad that ran in the New York Times on January 30th, 2009 to send a message to President elect Barack Obama from the 207 under signed economists that spending was NOT the way out of our finacial crisis! So far these professionals advice had been ignored and the elected Democrat financial "experts" continue to plod along expanding government's control over our lives and freedom. Call them and let them know that you are NOT pleased and that you want less government, not more! A reduction in taxes both personal and for business is the only tactic that will create jobs and expand the economy and therefor increase tax flow into the government. The government can not create jobs no matter what ANY politician tells you! Business creates the jobs and right now our government is doing everything in it's power to keep global business away and to stop small businesses from opening! Obviously, common sense is not a prerequisite for elected office.



"There is no disagreement that we need action by our government, a recovery plan that will help to jumpstart the economy."
— PRESIDENT-ELECT BARACK OBAMA, JANUARY 9 , 2009


With all due respect Mr. President, that is not true.

Notwithstanding reports that all economists are now Keynesians and that we all support a big increase in the burden of government, we do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance. More government spending by Hoover and Roosevelt did not pull the United States economy out of the Great Depression in the 1930s. More government spending did not solve Japan's "lost decade" in the 1990s. As such, it is a triumph of hope over experience to believe that more government spending will help the U.S. today. To improve the economy, policy makers should focus on reforms that remove impediments to work, saving, investment and production. Lower tax rates and a reduction in the burden of government are the best ways of using fiscal policy to boost growth.

Burton Abrams, Univ. of Delaware
Douglas Adie, Ohio University
Ryan Amacher, Univ. of Texas at Arlington
J.J. Arias, Georgia College & State University
Howard Baetjer, Jr., Towson University
Stacie Beck, Univ. of Delaware
Don Bellante, Univ. of South Florida
James Bennett, George Mason University
Bruce Benson, Florida State University
Sanjai Bhagat, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder
Mark Bils, Univ. of Rochester
Alberto Bisin, New York University
Walter Block, Loyola University New Orleans
Cecil Bohanon, Ball State University
Michele Boldrin, Washington University in St. Louis
Donald Booth, Chapman University
Michael Bordo, Rutgers University
Samuel Bostaph, Univ. of Dallas
Scott Bradford, Brigham Young University
Genevieve Briand, Eastern Washington University
George Brower, Moravian College
James Buchanan, Nobel laureate
Richard Burdekin, Claremont McKenna College
Henry Butler, Northwestern University
William Butos, Trinity College
Peter Calcagno, College of Charleston
Bryan Caplan, George Mason University
Art Carden, Rhodes College
James Cardon, Brigham Young University
Dustin Chambers, Salisbury University
Emily Chamlee-Wright, Beloit College
V.V. Chari, Univ. of Minnesota
Barry Chiswick, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago
Lawrence Cima, John Carroll University
J.R. Clark, Univ. of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Gian Luca Clementi, New York University
R. Morris Coats, Nicholls State University
John Cochran, Metropolitan State College
John Cochrane, Univ. of Chicago
John Cogan, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
John Coleman, Duke University
Boyd Collier, Tarleton State University
Robert Collinge, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio
Lee Coppock, Univ. of Virginia
Mario Crucini, Vanderbilt University
Christopher Culp, Univ. of Chicago
Kirby Cundiff, Northeastern State University
Antony Davies, Duquesne University
John Dawson, Appalachian State University
Clarence Deitsch, Ball State University
Arthur Diamond, Jr., Univ. of Nebraska at Omaha
John Dobra, Univ. of Nevada, Reno
James Dorn, Towson University
Christopher Douglas, Univ. of Michigan, Flint
Floyd Duncan, Virginia Military Institute
Francis Egan, Trinity College
John Egger, Towson University
Kenneth Elzinga, Univ. of Virginia
Paul Evans, Ohio State University
Eugene Fama, Univ. of Chicago
W. Ken Farr, Georgia College & State University
Hartmut Fischer, Univ. of San Francisco
Fred Foldvary, Santa Clara University
Murray Frank, Univ. of Minnesota
Peter Frank, Wingate University
Timothy Fuerst, Bowling Green State University
B. Delworth Gardner, Brigham Young University
John Garen, Univ. of Kentucky
Rick Geddes, Cornell University
Aaron Gellman, Northwestern University
William Gerdes, Clarke College
Michael Gibbs, Univ. of Chicago
Stephan Gohmann, Univ. of Louisville
Rodolfo Gonzalez, San Jose State University
Richard Gordon, Penn State University
Peter Gordon, Univ. of Southern California
Ernie Goss, Creighton University
Paul Gregory, Univ. of Houston
Earl Grinols, Baylor University
Daniel Gropper, Auburn University
R.W. Hafer, Southern Illinois
University, Edwardsville
Arthur Hall, Univ. of Kansas
Steve Hanke, Johns Hopkins
Stephen Happel, Arizona State University
Frank Hefner, College of Charleston
Ronald Heiner, George Mason University
David Henderson, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
Robert Herren, North Dakota State University
Gailen Hite, Columbia University
Steven Horwitz, St. Lawrence University
John Howe, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia
Jeffrey Hummel, San Jose State University
Bruce Hutchinson, Univ. of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Brian Jacobsen, Wisconsin Lutheran College
Jason Johnston, Univ. of Pennsylvania
Boyan Jovanovic, New York University
Jonathan Karpoff, Univ. of Washington
Barry Keating, Univ. of Notre Dame
Naveen Khanna, Michigan State University
Nicholas Kiefer, Cornell University
Daniel Klein, George Mason University
Paul Koch, Univ. of Kansas
Narayana Kocherlakota, Univ. of Minnesota
Marek Kolar, Delta College
Roger Koppl, Fairleigh Dickinson University
Kishore Kulkarni, Metropolitan State College of Denver
Deepak Lal, UCLA
George Langelett, South Dakota State University
James Larriviere, Spring Hill College
Robert Lawson, Auburn University
John Levendis, Loyola University New Orleans
David Levine, Washington University in St. Louis
Peter Lewin, Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Dean Lillard, Cornell University
Zheng Liu, Emory University
Alan Lockard, Binghampton University
Edward Lopez, San Jose State University
John Lunn, Hope College
Glenn MacDonald, Washington
University in St. Louis
Michael Marlow, California
Polytechnic State University
Deryl Martin, Tennessee Tech University
Dale Matcheck, Northwood University
Deirdre McCloskey, Univ. of Illinois, Chicago
John McDermott, Univ. of South Carolina
Joseph McGarrity, Univ. of Central Arkansas
Roger Meiners, Univ. of Texas at Arlington
Allan Meltzer, Carnegie Mellon University
John Merrifield, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio
James Miller III, George Mason University
Jeffrey Miron, Harvard University
Thomas Moeller, Texas Christian University
John Moorhouse, Wake Forest University
Andrea Moro, Vanderbilt University
Andrew Morriss, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael Munger, Duke University
Kevin Murphy, Univ. of Southern California
Richard Muth, Emory University
Charles Nelson, Univ. of Washington
Seth Norton, Wheaton College
Lee Ohanian, Univ. of California, Los Angeles
Lydia Ortega, San Jose State University
Evan Osborne, Wright State University
Randall Parker, East Carolina University
Donald Parsons, George Washington University
Sam Peltzman, Univ. of Chicago
Mark Perry, Univ. of Michigan, Flint
Christopher Phelan, Univ. of Minnesota
Gordon Phillips, Univ. of Maryland
Michael Pippenger, Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks
Tomasz Piskorski, Columbia University
Brennan Platt, Brigham Young University
Joseph Pomykala, Towson University
William Poole, Univ. of Delaware
Barry Poulson, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder
Benjamin Powell, Suffolk University
Edward Prescott, Nobel laureate
Gary Quinlivan, Saint Vincent College
Reza Ramazani, Saint Michael's College
Adriano Rampini, Duke University
Eric Rasmusen, Indiana University
Mario Rizzo, New York University
Richard Roll, Univ. of California, Los Angeles
Robert Rossana, Wayne State University
James Roumasset, Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa
John Rowe, Univ. of South Florida
Charles Rowley, George Mason University
Juan Rubio-Ramirez, Duke University
Roy Ruffin, Univ. of Houston
Kevin Salyer, Univ. of California, Davis
Pavel Savor, Univ. of Pennsylvania
Ronald Schmidt, Univ. of Rochester
Carlos Seiglie, Rutgers University
William Shughart II, Univ. of Mississippi
Charles Skipton, Univ. of Tampa
James Smith, Western Carolina University
Vernon Smith, Nobel laureate
Lawrence Southwick, Jr., Univ. at Buffalo
Dean Stansel, Florida Gulf Coast University
Houston Stokes, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago
Brian Strow, Western Kentucky University
Shirley Svorny, California State
University, Northridge
John Tatom, Indiana State University
Wade Thomas, State University of New York at Oneonta
Henry Thompson, Auburn University
Alex Tokarev, The King's College
Edward Tower, Duke University
Leo Troy, Rutgers University
David Tuerck, Suffolk University
Charlotte Twight, Boise State University
Kamal Upadhyaya, Univ. of New Haven
Charles Upton, Kent State University
T. Norman Van Cott, Ball State University
Richard Vedder, Ohio University
Richard Wagner, George Mason University
Douglas M. Walker, College of Charleston
Douglas O. Walker, Regent University
Christopher Westley, Jacksonville State University
Lawrence White, Univ. of Missouri at St. Louis
Walter Williams, George Mason University
Doug Wills, Univ. of Washington Tacoma
Dennis Wilson, Western Kentucky University
Gary Wolfram, Hillsdale College
Huizhong Zhou, Western Michigan University
Additional economists who have signed the statement
Lee Adkins, Oklahoma State University
William Albrecht, Univ. of Iowa
Donald Alexander, Western Michigan University
Geoffrey Andron, Austin Community College
Nathan Ashby, Univ. of Texas at El Paso
George Averitt, Purdue North Central University
Charles Baird, California State University, East Bay
Timothy Bastian, Creighton University
John Bethune, Barton College
Robert Bise, Orange Coast College
Karl Borden, University of Nebraska
Donald Boudreaux, George Mason University
Ivan Brick, Rutgers University
Phil Bryson, Brigham Young University
Richard Burkhauser, Cornell University
Edwin Burton, Univ. of Virginia
Jim Butkiewicz, Univ. of Delaware
Richard Cebula, Armstrong Atlantic State University
Don Chance, Louisiana State University
Robert Chatfield, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas
Lloyd Cohen, George Mason University
Peter Colwell, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael Connolly, Univ. of Miami
Jim Couch, Univ. of North Alabama
Eleanor Craig, Univ. of Delaware
Michael Daniels, Columbus State University
A. Edward Day, Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Stephen Dempsey, Univ. of Vermont
Allan DeSerpa, Arizona State University
William Dewald, Ohio State University
Jeff Dorfman, Univ. of Georgia
Lanny Ebenstein, Univ. of California, Santa Barbara
Michael Erickson, The College of Idaho
Jack Estill, San Jose State University
Dorla Evans, Univ. of Alabama in Huntsville
Frank Falero, California State University, Bakersfield
Daniel Feenberg, National Bureau of Economic Research
Eric Fisher, California Polytechnic State University
Arthur Fleisher, Metropolitan State College of Denver
William Ford, Middle Tennessee State University
Ralph Frasca, Univ. of Dayton
Joseph Giacalone, St. John's University
Adam Gifford, California State Unviersity, Northridge
Otis Gilley, Louisiana Tech University
J. Edward Graham, University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Richard Grant, Lipscomb University
Gauri-Shankar Guha, Arkansas State University
Darren Gulla, Univ. of Kentucky
Dennis Halcoussis, California State University, Northridge
Richard Hart, Miami University
James Hartley, Mount Holyoke College
Thomas Hazlett, George Mason University
Scott Hein, Texas Tech University
Bradley Hobbs, Florida Gulf Coast University
John Hoehn, Michigan State University
Daniel Houser, George Mason University
Thomas Howard, University of Denver
Chris Hughen, Univ. of Denver
Marcus Ingram, Univ. of Tampa
Joseph Jadlow, Oklahoma State University
Sherry Jarrell, Wake Forest University
Carrie Kerekes, Florida Gulf Coast University
Robert Krol, California State University, Northridge
James Kurre, Penn State Erie
Tom Lehman, Indiana Wesleyan University
W. Cris Lewis, Utah State University
Stan Liebowitz, Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Anthony Losasso, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago
John Lott, Jr., Univ. of Maryland
Keith Malone, Univ. of North Alabama
Henry Manne, George Mason University
Richard Marcus, Univ. of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Timothy Mathews, Kennesaw State University
John Matsusaka, Univ. of Southern California
Thomas Mayor, Univ. of Houston
W. Douglas McMillin, Louisiana State University
Mario Miranda, The Ohio State University
Ed Miseta, Penn State Erie
James Moncur, Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa
Charles Moss, Univ. of Florida
Tim Muris, George Mason University
John Murray, Univ. of Toledo
David Mustard, Univ. of Georgia
Steven Myers, Univ. of Akron
Dhananjay Nanda, University of Miami
Stephen Parente, Univ. of Minnesota
Allen Parkman, Univ. of New Mexico
Douglas Patterson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and University
Timothy Perri, Appalachian State University
Mark Pingle, Univ. of Nevada, Reno
Richard Rawlins, Missouri Southern State University
Thomas Rhee, California State University, Long Beach
Christine Ries, Georgia Institute of Technology
Nancy Roberts, Arizona State University
Larry Ross, Univ. of Alaska Anchorage
Timothy Roth, Univ. of Texas at El Paso
Atulya Sarin, Santa Clara University
Thomas Saving, Texas A&M University
Eric Schansberg, Indiana University Southeast
Alan Shapiro, Univ. of Southern California
Frank Spreng, McKendree University
Judith Staley Brenneke, John Carroll University
John E. Stapleford, Eastern University
Courtenay Stone, Ball State University
Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, UCLA
Scott Sumner, Bentley University
Clifford Thies, Shenandoah University
William Trumbull, West Virginia University
Gustavo Ventura, Univ. of Iowa
Marc Weidenmier, Claremont McKenna College
Robert Whaples, Wake Forest University
Gene Wunder, Washburn University
John Zdanowicz, Florida International University
Jerry Zimmerman, Univ. of Rochester
Joseph Zoric, Franciscan University of Steubenville

Economic collapse, giving mortgages to people who could never pay them back, more and more gov't spending without a way to pay for it. Where has common sense gone?

As Congress debates yet another "stimulus package" that just so happens to be full of pork for long time Democrat organizations and issues and hardly any stimulus for businesses in the U.S. You may be asking yourself why? Why hasn't Barack Obama denounced this new "stimulus" bill crafted by the democrats when he said time and again that he would sign NO Bill that had pork in it? Instead he is promoting it. In fact, he is saying he needs it NOW! Geez, where did we hear that before? Oh, I know the first stimulus bill for $700 Billion that is a total disaster with no positive effects at all!

Wondering why this is all happening? Wondering why the liberals and some Republicans just don't "get it" that another "stimulus package" isn't going to work. Well, please click on this link from the American Thinker and read James Simpson's article about The Cloward-Piven Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis and how it's being implemented now by the Democrats, and even some Republicans, even though unwittingly I suspect, to gain more and more power, more of your money and more control over your and your families. In short, they are using this strategy to finally introduce socialism here in America!

You will see the strategy of the treasonous left that wants a total socialist takeover of our country! This article connects Saul Alinsky, William Ayers, the weather underground and Acorn to Cloward and Piven! After reading it all will be clear! It is time to stop talking and start coming up with a strategy to DEFEND OUR COUNTRY!!! It is no longer a case of Republican vs Democrat. These people who came up from the counter culture of the 50's and 60's are well beyond that. The students of Cloward and Piven as well as Saul Alinsky are now IN the government! We, the ill informed, pro American population who just want to be left alone to live our lives are now the only defense for what is happening in Washington!

If you do nothing else, call your Senators and House Reps and tell them to vote NO on ANY "Stimulus" package or corporate bailout! The Democrats that have orchestrated this are banking on your fear to get things done fast and then it will be too late! They said the sky was falling in the initial $700 Billion stimulus package and after three weeks of delaying, nothing happened! After the first $350 Billion has been given away, nothing has changed! Except they don't know where the money is and now they want 1.2 Trillion more dollars of your money for what? How about this little tid bit, $4.2 Billion for the corrupt organization ACORN! They are being investigated in 14 states for voter fraud and corruption and Barack Obama wants us to ok 4.2 Billion dollars for them. Why? They are a PRIVATE, non profit corporation!!!! WHY?! What about $200 MILLION for contraceptives? $200 MILLION!!!!! Why? That has since been taken out, but why was it there to begin with? Economic stimulus?? The Democrats aren't taking this economic "crisis" seriously at all. If they were they would cut our income taxes, suspend tax on business to attract companies to move back here and employ our people! They would stop spending!! How can you stimulate an economy when you are drowning in debt? WAKE UP PEOPLE. THIS ISN'T A GAME! These treasonous fools in Congress are mortgaging your future, your kids, grand kids and great grand kids futures for their own idealogical and monetary gain! Pass this on and ask everyone you know to read the article and call their Reps and demand that they stop this insanity now!